Very cool. What specifically do you attribute the improved smoothness to?
Very cool. What specifically do you attribute the improved smoothness to?
I'm going to say the Lindskog dynamic balancing is what did the trick. It really is quite a dramatic difference over stock...and in stock configuration,there were two 3lb. "unbalanced" balance shafts spinning at twice crank speed to neutralize the engine vibrations. I would think GM/Saab would just balance everything dynamically to eliminate vibrations rather than the setup they use. Maybe I'm missing something,but to me the Lindskog setup seems better with a lot less hardware. Maybe it's not possible to do it economically on a mass production scale…?
The power of an Atom is a terrible thing to waste! Atom owner/operator since 2007. The more you chase perfection,the faster it becomes. John Force for President! (I asked him once in person...he laughed)

Is it smooth at all RPM? I cut off my balance shafts, and I have some vibration at a certain RPM. It's not a big deal, but that's interesting that you have none at all.
"You little punk bitch." -Wade Huisman, Keizer Wheels
Ryan,I wouldn't say there is none at all,but it is substantially less than stock. At idle speed,it is virtually zero. At around 3k there is a bit of a buzz..about like stock,but that's it. At 6.5k it's eerie smooth. I am very happy with the results,although I haven't taken it for a romp because of the typical Ma. shitty-ass-suck-hole weather. Two more years and I'll be heading for Az..![]()
The power of an Atom is a terrible thing to waste! Atom owner/operator since 2007. The more you chase perfection,the faster it becomes. John Force for President! (I asked him once in person...he laughed)
Inline 4 engines cannot be perfectly balanced as you describe. The two pistons/rods going up don't exactly cancel the two going down. That's what the balance shafts are for. Lighter/smaller engines sometimes don't bother with it, as in motorcycles. Larger rod ratios help some too.
I'm sure factory balancing is done primarily to get maximum results (smoothness) in the "normal" operating RPM range...probably in the 2-4k area,with minimum expense. Custom balancing tends to favor higher operating ranges. This is why Lindskog asks what the purpose of the engine will be. Makes sense to me.![]()
Last edited by MadMaxAtom; February 23, 2014 at 09:14 AM.
The power of an Atom is a terrible thing to waste! Atom owner/operator since 2007. The more you chase perfection,the faster it becomes. John Force for President! (I asked him once in person...he laughed)
Tea trays (painted semi-gloss black) and scoop in place with race roll bar installed and exhaust mounted…sure is nice to see Max back whole again…
CIMG4304.jpg
The power of an Atom is a terrible thing to waste! Atom owner/operator since 2007. The more you chase perfection,the faster it becomes. John Force for President! (I asked him once in person...he laughed)
Bookmarks